THE LOST GIRL
The tragic story of the lives and deaths of two young women
gives insights into the part a Large Group Awareness Training played in their
emotional struggles.
The Newsweek article “The Lost Girl” tells the story of two models, Ruslana
Korshunova and Anastasia Drozdova. After facing career and personal problems,
the women attended a Rose of the World Large Group Awareness Training (LGAT). Rose
of the World, like many other LGATs such as Breakthrough, was based on
Lifespring. Rose told participants that it would help them gain personality
development, create transformation and realize their goals. The women paid just
under $1,000 for a three day training. When asked to
confess their worst experiences, Ruslana was the most enthusiastic speaker. She
confessed, cried, laughed, shouted, remembered, meditated, danced, and felt
ecstasy.
The women paid for more training.
Anastasia spent almost a year attending trainings at Rose, while Ruslana was
there three months. After several months, friends noticed changes in their
behavior. Anastasia started arguments then burst into tears, missed castings,
and became reclusive. Ruslana became aggressive. Ruslana
apparently committed suicide in 2008, and Anastasia in
2009.
Rose of the World’s reaction to
Ruslana’s regression reveals something about its attitude to participants and
its tendency to blame problems on them rather than consider whether the
trainings were powerless, or even part of the problem. Rose assistant Volodya
said,
“Ruslana had what we call a ‘rollback.’
She felt a little strange. You’d find her wandering round town, unsure what she
was doing there. Maybe she’d cry at night. But she couldn’t have killed herself.
We cured her of any problems she might have. And Anastasia?
She was messed up already. We tried to help her, we really tried. But she
refused transformation. Blame modeling, maybe drugs, not us.” (Newsweek, “The Lost Girl,” by Peter
Pomerantsev, May 9, 2011, p.57)
Note that Rose saw emotional
problems in enough clients that they had a term for it- “rollback.” This
suggests that the LGAT transformation is not a core change in people, but a
temporary suspension of personal failings or stressful feelings. Certainly LGAT
promotional literature ever mentions the prospect of “rollback.” Volodya’s comments
also imply that even a full year of trainings were powerless to help these
women. In fact, their “rollback” regression describes emotions and behavior
that were worse after the trainings than before. Rose believed it “cured”
Anastasia even though she obviously showed deep emotional and behavioral
problems.
Rose readily blamed the dead women for “refusing”
transformation. This is consistent with LGAT theory, which blames people for
the problems in their lives because they choose to be victims rather than
overcoming obstacles. There is no hint that “rollbacks” prompt LGATs to
seriously evaluate their trainings for flaws.
“The Lost Girl” asked Rick Ross of
Cult Education Forum to respond to Rose. Ross offered a different evaluation of
LGATs:
“These organizations never blame
themselves. They always say, ‘It’s the victim’s fault.’ They work like drugs:
giving you peak experiences, their adherents always coming back for more. The
serious problems start when people leave. The trainings have become their
lives- they come back to emptiness. The sensitive ones break.” (“The Lost Girl,”
p. 57)
The feeling of transformation that
LGATs skillfully generate in a few hours is not the same as actual transformation
of a person’s inner life and character, and “rollbacks” may take people into
even worse territory than they inhabited before a LGAT.
People have a variety of experiences
in and after attending LGATs. But cautionary stories of rollbacks should
make anyone consider seriously what LGATs are, what they can do, and what they
cannot.
Dr. John
Juedes, 2011